Comply with the Law of War Part 4 Reviews
Quick Review 3
19 of 24
<img src="../../images/multipleChoiceVeryShortV115.gif" width="760" height="445" border="0">
&questionText=When is the "superior orders" defense valid in a war crimes trial? Select the best answer.& &lure1=Only when the accused can definitely prove that a commander gave the order to commit a crime.& &lure2=Only when the accused can definitely prove that the commander knew the order was illegal.& &lure3=Only when the accused did not know, or could not have reasonably been expected to know that the act ordered was illegal.& &lure4=Only when the accused knew that the act ordered was illegal and a violation of the Law of War, but committed it anyway.& &correctResponse=3& &correctFeedback=Correct. The superior orders defense is valid only if the accused did not know, or could not have reasonably been expected to know that the act ordered was illegal.& &correctFeedback2=Correct. The superior orders defense is valid only if the accused did not know, or could not have reasonably been expected to know that the act ordered was illegal.& &incorrectFeedback1=Incorrect. Knowledge plays a big part here. Try again.& &failedFeedback=Incorrect, Soldier. The superior orders defense is valid only if the accused did not know, or could not have
reasonably been expected to know that the act ordered was illegal. & &link=i397p0940.html& &attempts=2&
Previous page
Click here to go to a specific page within the topic
Click here to view additional information for this course
Click here to hear the audio clip for the current page
Click here to view the video clip for the current page
Click here to view additional information for this page
Click here to view the options menu
Click here to go back to the most previously viewed page