&questionText=When is the "superior orders" defense valid in a war crimes trial? Select the best answer.&
&lure1=Only when the accused can definitely prove that a commander gave the order to commit a crime.&
&lure2=Only when the accused can definitely prove that the commander knew the order was illegal.&
&lure3=Only when the accused did not know, or could not have reasonably been expected to know that the act ordered was illegal.&
&lure4=Only when the accused knew that the act ordered was illegal and a violation of the Law of War, but committed it anyway.&
&correctResponse=3&
&correctFeedback=Correct. The superior orders defense is valid only if the accused did not know, or could not have reasonably been expected to know that the act ordered was illegal.&
&correctFeedback2=Correct. The superior orders defense is valid only if the accused did not know, or could not have reasonably been expected to know that the act ordered was illegal.&
&incorrectFeedback1=Incorrect. Knowledge plays a big part here. Try again.&
&failedFeedback=Incorrect, Soldier. The superior orders defense is valid only if the accused did not know, or could not have
reasonably been expected to know that the act ordered was illegal. &
&link=i397p0940.html&
&attempts=2&